In Defence of Pornography
By Sheraz Qureshi
I've tried to think of every single objection people have to pornography
and to rebut them all. If I've missed any then feel free to tell me
(the forum is there for a reason!)
Warning: Feminists may not approve of this
What is Pornography?
Pornography is linked with masturbation. It's an aid that single men,
and in increasing numbers, women as well as couples use to help them
reach various states of arousal and possibly climax. There are some
things which clearly are not acceptable routes for arousal - and by
that I mean child pornography, bestiality, pornography that simulates
rape
these would cause offence in all major cultures whereas pornography
would not.
Isn't it really unnatural?
Pornography is a relative term and a natural consequence of the human
condition. What do I mean by that - well - even if you were brought
up in a society where for example, movies / images of sex and full frontal
nudity were not available - all that would happen is that your definition
of what's " pornographic " would change - i.e if you were
male it would take less to arouse you, and say an image of a lady exposing
her leg would have the equivalent effect that full on nudity has now
But shouldn't we still try to get rid of it?
Pornography will always exist, and that's not because of market forces,
it is because of the basic instincts that exist within us, we will always
find certain images / scenes to be stimulating and there is a part of
us that will always want to seek such media out. If it doesn't exist,
then we create it...
There are two sub points here - the first is that because pornography
is an inevitable consequence of the basic forces that drive human behaviour
- to be opposed to pornography is to in effect, hate yourself - and
the second is that because we live in the age of media - images be they
static or moving, of men and women will always be around, and if we
link that to the concept of pornography as a relative term then - you
get to the point where you realise that pornography will always exist.
But isn't it addictive?
From a Neuronal perspective, sex will always result in the stronger
orgasm, in other words, in theory sex is more addictive then pornography,
so using that line of argument, sex is more of a threat to society
but in any case, only a minority will get addicted to pornography -
and u don't legislate* for what the majority can or cant do based on
a dysfunctional minority.
What about the Women in the Industry who are abused?
That's the result of societies' attitude towards pornography. If you
treat it like it's an evil, then that means that because it isn't seen
as a 'mainstream profession' the personality type that goes for it is
more vulnerable.
Of course I am not trying to justify any form of abuse that does occur
- if people working in the industry subject employees to abuse that
is unacceptable, but industries can only get away with not being transparent
if they are marginalized - if society changes its attitude, there is
less abuse.
It devalues sex?
Pornography serves to reinforces the importance of sex, people masturbate,
but then they got bored and want to move onto something else
But it results in People feeling Inferior?
The claim here is that distorted body size in pornographic media is
linked to depression in men (penis size) and women (anorexia, breast
size). To counter that:
1. Fantasy - People don't want to watch average Joe / plain Jane. People
create the demand. In other words it's not the fault of the industry.
To use this argument is to argue against all film / and media.
2. The growth in the amateur market. Pornography is unique in this respect;
it's a media where the average thrives....
Isn't it degrading to Women?
1. Go back 50, 60, 70 years say and the social framework of today can
be traced back to the puritanical systems of old, i.e a system in which
sex was equated with sin - and relics of that still exist.
'Pornography' has played a role in liberating women, and re enforcing
the idea that its actually ok for women to dress in a way that makes
them 'feel sexy' and to enjoy sex, without being ostracised by society.
2. What happens in the bedroom challenging peoples' perception
of normality and specifically here the dynamic between men and women
and the idea of the subservient women being taken head on.
What I am getting at here, is that one of the more popular themes within
pornography is that of domination and submission, and the idea of women
being portrayed as a dominatrix and the extent to which that contrasts
with traditional roles that women are expected to take.
By popularising this concept of the women as dominant
over the male - there is a clear knock on effect, albeit subconsciously,
and it has wider effects on the direction that society as a whole then
moves in, just look at the recent trends in the advertising industry
3. The economic angle: Women in the porn industry earn
more then men.
But Pornography increases the chances of women being raped?
Compare statistics for rape in countries with liberal attitudes towards
pornography, with those who have more hard line views
But it's only dodgy men who buy Porn?
Maybe in Britain and the US. We should strive towards the European ideal,
where more couples buy porn, and hence the type of pornography produced
is different.
Isn't pornography really boring?
Only because the more you see, the more it repeats itself... and that's
the same with anything
Isn't it far too mainstream now though?
It means that its got to the stage where even if you don't watch pornography
your life has benefited from it, whether that's through an increased
awareness of what u can do in the bedroom, or the breaking down of the
stigmas associated with sex.
What ever happened to being Civilised?
This concept of being civilised is really relative. Ancient civilisations
practised cannibalism. We would view that as being ' wrong, 'but in
reality it helped these people cope with death. It played an important
role, and empowered. And that's what any civilisation should aim to
do ' empower ' - to be designed so that its citizens are able to cope
with the day to day realities of being. With regards to pornography,
I don't think that a civilised society would act to get rid of it? A
person's ability to express themselves sexually is an important component
of their happiness, and if pornography helps that without adversely
effecting the rest of society - then wouldn't total censorship be more
barbaric?
By Sheraz Qureshi
* With things like murder and anti terrorist laws you
clearly do. The only point I was trying to make is that most people
who use pornography won't end up self destructing because of it, and
those that do would most likely do so anyway. The parallel I am thinking
of is with alcohol, most people who use it wont ruin their lives because
of it, and you dont prohibit it because of the minority.
Perv or protest over this rant on our message boards
here
|